|
Sweeps, Drafts &
Uploads
The
Electronic Funds Transfer Debate
by Ron Webber
Electronically
transferring premium funds to an insurance company has been “a hot
potato” topic since the first insurance company began drafting funds
from agents’ checking accounts.
In 1992, as an agent, I had my first encounter with electronic funds
transfers. We have come a long way since those early days of
erroneous entries and double debiting by the insurance companies. In
fact, it was so bad, that I opened a special account and deposited any
of the funds to be debited into to that account. I suggested to the
insurance companies that they each have their own special account and be
fully responsible for any bank fees and charge backs that occurred. That
was a reasonable solution when only two or three companies were sweeping
the funds from the agency account. Today so many companies require
electronic transfer of funds that a new way of managing these funds has
become necessary.
I
believe a separate account is necessary for managing all premiums,
including those that are directly withdrawn from your account by the
insurance companies. Many states require agencies to have a premium
trust or escrow account into which all premiums collected by the agency
are deposited. Even if your state does not require a trust account, I
highly recommend a separate premium or escrow accounting system. I would
not allow the sweep or drafting of my main operating account. Let the
trust account handle all the electronic deductions of funds.
I
have seen many different ways of handling this task. Most involve some
sort of manual listing of each EFT. This method worked as long as only a
few companies were drafting and the bank statement listed each entry
with a detailed reference.
Of
course, almost every company reinvented the wheel when they designed
their EFT system. Some companies draft all the payments daily in a lump
sum. Others seem to draft at will, for one day, two days, even a
day and a half, and who can figure out what some are doing. So how do
you ever reconcile a bank statement for EFTs?
Here
is an example of how this might be accomplished in your agency.
Most
successful methods of managing and reconciling EFTs require the use of
good agency automation software. Since I am most familiar with The
Agency Advantage for Windows, I will use it in my example to
show how agency software can handle the EFT payments and the
reconciliation of the statements.
When
a payment is received, a receipt is issued to the customer by the
software. On the receipt, a block is checked to indicate that the
payment is going to be transmitted electronically.
Later,
after the daily deposit has been balanced, these payments will not
appear with the checks to be printed. They will be held in the
electronic fund transfer section until moved to the check register. The
EFT entries are compared to the agency copy of the receipt and the
confirmation receipt or form generated by the insurance company
software.
Since
we know that the deposit balanced, then we know that we have receipted
the correct amount tendered by the insured and this double check will
confirm that the correct amount was uploaded.
Next,
evaluate whether the company deduction is by individual payments or
groups of payments and then determine the frequency of the deductions.
The group method of deductions is not bad as long as the company
supplies the details electronically in a report every time they transfer
funds. The simplest method, however, is the individual deduction for
each payment. (I am sure there is a cost saving involved from the
bank for grouping payments compared to individual deductions.) I have
seen as many as 75 to 100 payments being uploaded by some agencies on a
daily basis. So, you can imagine how big the job of reconciling a bank
statement once a month has become.
To
my knowledge, The Agency Advantage software is the only
one that I know about that has EFT management integrated into its
system. It allows you to post the EFT’s individually or by group to
the check register. This greatly facilitates the balancing of the check
register.
I once worked with a large agency in New York State that processed so
many EFTs per day that the bank faxed them a daily bank statement for
reconciliation purposes. I do not know if the bank charged extra for
this service but I know that they were able to stay on top of their
EFT’s with little or no problems. E & O situations created by
drafts not being received by the company and situations of agents
uploading the payment twice were resolved immediately. If this service
is available from your bank, I highly recommend that you look into it.
If your bank does not offer such a service, why not suggest that they
may want to be the leader in your area for offering such services.
Many
agents have resisted the insurance companies’ methods and rules for
electronic transfers. Some agencies have vigorously resisted electronic
transactions altogether. Some so strongly that they refuse to do
business with companies, that requires EFTs. In spite of this
resistance, the companies are moving ahead with more and more requiring
electronic transmittal of funds as they search for lower acquisition
costs and expenses.
It
is happening industry wide, with the independent and captive companies.
Even in the Life Insurance industry, door-to-door collectors of premiums
are now recording their receipts electronically on the insured’s
doorstep and depositing their funds into a special bank account where
the funds are swept daily.
The
debate continues, but the inevitable seems to be that all companies will
be requiring every independent agency in America to make its’ checking
account accessible to the companies. So, be ready. Start examining
your methods for handling these EFT’s now and don’t get caught down
the road still trying to figure out a way to cope with these changes.
Thanks to all who responded so favorably to my recent article entitled
“Automate or Evaporate” (FYI Feb. 2001). No truer words have ever
been spoken.
Until
next month, keep automating those agencies; I really believe it is the
only way that you are going to survive in the 21st
Century.
Remember,
the bottom line is "Automation equals Productivity and
Profitability."
Ron
Webber
[top of
page] |